Effectiveness and Safety of Sculptra Poly-L-Lactic Acid Injectable Implant in the Correction of Cheek Wrinkles.

BACKGROUND: The current study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of Sculptra injectable poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA-SCA) treatment in correcting cheek wrinkles compared with a no-treatment control. METHODS: Male/female immune-competent adults (aged >21 years) with moderate/severe cheek wrinkles, graded using the Galderma Cheek Wrinkle Scale (GCWS) at rest, were randomized 2:1 to receive PLLA-SCA injections (150 mg; 8 mL reconstitution in sterile water for injection) + 1 mL lidocaine hydrochloride (2%), administered immediately after reconstitution, or no treatment (control). Up to 3 additional treatments were allowed at monthly intervals, and follow-up was at months 7, 9, and 12. The primary endpoint was 1-grade or greater improvement in GCWS at rest for both cheeks at month 12. RESULTS: GCWS at rest responder rate was significantly higher with PLLA-SCA treatment versus the no-treatment control at months 7 (66.2% versus 38.6%; P=0.0043), 9 (70.6% versus 31.1%; P<0.0001), and 12 (71.6% versus 26.1%; P<0.0001). Treating investigators reported improvements in skin radiance (>95%), tighter appearance (>88%), and jawline contour (>85%). PLLA-SCA recipients reported high satisfaction levels regarding improvements in skin radiance (90% or greater), sagging (84% or greater), and firmness (91% or greater) as well as natural-looking results (85% or greater) and a desire for repeat treatment (84% or greater). Treatment-related adverse events were mostly mild in severity with no serious events related to PLLA-SCA injections. CONCLUSION: Injectable PLLA-SCA treatments were well tolerated and significantly reduced the severity of moderate/severe cheek lines and wrinkles, while improving skin quality. Effectiveness was durable over the 12-month study period with high subject-reported satisfaction, natural-looking appearance, and enthusiasm for repeat treatments. CLINICALTRIALS: gov registry number: NCT04124692J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(1):1297-1305.        doi:10.36849/JDD.7729.

Antioxidant Skincare Treatment for Hyperpigmented and Photodamaged Skin: Multi-Center, Open-Label, Cross-Seasonal Case Study.

Objective: The objective of this study is three-fold. Firstly, to evaluate an enhanced vitamin C serum (eVCS) and its' combination with a retinol-bakuchiol serum (RBS) on pigmentation in vitro. Secondly, to evaluate the effect of the eVCS on skin function ex vivo. Lastly, to evaluate eVCS and RSB in the treatment of facial hyperpigmentation and overall photodamage across a range of opposing environments. Methods: MelanoDerm™ tissues were topically treated with the eVCS, and a eVCS and RSB blend for 14 days, and then a melanin assay was performed. Surgical waste facial skin explants were incubated with the eVCS or control for five days and then fixed and stained for skin physiology and structure. A 12-week, IRB approved, study on female subjects (n=29, aged 35 to 65) with moderate global facial hyperpigmentation and overall photodamage was completed. Clinical assessment, tolerability measurements, and subject-assessments were performed baseline at Weeks 6, 8, and 12. Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Score was completed at Week 12. Results: The eVCS-treated facial skin explants achieved a significant 145 percent collagen increase compared to control. The eVCS-RSB combination proved synergistic in reducing melanin compared to the eVCS alone. The eVCS-RSB combination demonstrated significant clinical improvement at all timepoints and was well tolerated. Subject responses were favorable and GAIS score of 3.0 was achieved at Week 12, indicating an improvement. Limitations: Limitations include lack of placebo or vehicle control. Conclusion: The product pairing, eVCS and RSB, offers patients an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment to target pigmentation and photodamage. Clinical Trial: This study, Pro00050557, was approved by Advarra IRB (Columbia, Maryland) and submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov #: NCT05423873.

The Association of Academic Cosmetic Dermatology: improving cosmetic dermatology education through collaboration, research, and advocacy.

Cosmetic and laser procedures are increasingly popular among patients and are skills in which dermatologists are regarded as well trained. Most dermatology residents intend to incorporate cosmetic procedures into their practice and prefer to learn such procedures during residency through direct patient care. However, there are notable challenges in optimizing how residents are trained in cosmetic and laser dermatology. To address these barriers and elevate the practice of cosmetic dermatology in academic medicine, the Association of Academic Cosmetic Dermatology (AACD) was founded in 2021 as the lead professional society for dermatologists who direct the education of resident trainees in cosmetic and laser dermatology. The AACD, a group of board-certified dermatologists who teach cosmetic and laser dermatology to residents, aims to improve cosmetic dermatology education through collaboration, research, and advocacy.

Needs and Gaps in Resident Trainee Education, Clinical Patient Care, and Clinical Research in Cosmetic Dermatology: Position Statement of the Association of Academic Cosmetic Dermatology.

Cosmetic dermatology is a key subspecialty of academic dermatology. As such, academic centers are expected to demonstrate excellence in the teaching of cosmetic dermatology skills to trainees, the clinical delivery of cosmetic dermatology services to patients, and the performance of clinical research that advances knowledge and uncovers new therapies in cosmetic dermatology. The Association of Academic Cosmetic Dermatology (AACD), a newly formed medical professional society, includes as its principal aims the support of all of these areas. AACD is comprised of group of board-certified dermatologists who teach cosmetic and laser dermatology at US dermatology residency programs. An expert panel constituted by the AACD recently convened a workshop to review gaps pertaining to academic cosmetic dermatology. This panel considered needs and potential corrective initiatives in three domains: resident education, patient experience, and clinical research. The work of the panel was used to develop a roadmap, which was adopted by consensus, and which will serve to guide the AACD moving forward.

SUPPLEMENT ARTICLE: Scientific and Clinical Insights into the Facial Application of Mineralizing Volcanic Water.

BACKGROUND: The term "exposome" describes the totality of exposures an individual is subjected to from conception to death. Both internal and external exposome factors affect skin health. External exposures that contribute to facial skin aging include solar radiation, air pollution, tobacco smoke, and unbalanced nutrition. The review explores scientific and clinical insights into the exposome impact on facial skin aging and topical mineralizing volcanic water use potential benefits. METHODS: An expert panel of seven dermatologists and two clinical researchers specializing in aesthetic and dermatological indications reviewed and discussed the literature on the exposome and mineralizing volcanic water's role in relation to the exposome. Two virtual advisory boards were conducted between February and May 2021. Following the meetings, an additional systematic literature review explored publications relevant to the exposome, topical essential minerals, and skin health. The results of the two advisory boards, coupled with expert opinion and the outcome of the updated systematic literature review, informed the statements on which the advisors reached a consensus. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of in vivo, in vitro, and clinical data on topical mineralizing volcanic water application indicates that the serum supports the skin's antioxidant defenses and reduces skin inflammation. Additionally, the serum may have benefits as an adjunct for facial dermatoses and post-procedural skincare. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21:4(Suppl 1):s3-10.

Beyond Muscle: A Narrative Review of Onabotulinum Toxin A for Skin Quality.

BACKGROUND: Onabotulinum toxin A’s (BoNTA’s) popularity is centered on its quick, predictable, and safe ability to improve clinically apparent rhytides. While this remains the only FDA indication for BoNTA, recent research suggests that BoNTA may have a much wider use for the improvement of overall skin quality. OBJECTIVE: This review will focus on the various evidence and uses of BoNTA for improvement of skin quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review considered published journal articles (clinical trials, case studies, scientific reviews). Studies were identified by searching the PubMed database and reference lists of respective articles. Only articles available in English were considered for this review. RESULTS: Intramuscular and intradermal injections of BoNTA decrease sebum production, pore size, facial erythema and flushing, and resting lines. BoNTA induces neocollagenesis and restores the extracellular matrix. CONCLUSION: The literature provides both in vivo and in vitro evidence that BoNTA enhances skin quality beyond its well-studied neuromuscular effect. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(9):958-962. doi:10.36849/JDD.6038.

A Randomized, Comparator-Controlled Study of HARC for Cheek Augmentation and Correction of Midface Contour Deficiencies.

BACKGROUND: HARC is a soft and flexible hyaluronic acid filler containing lidocaine, manufactured using XpresHAn® technology, restoring natural-looking volume and soft contours. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate safety and effectiveness of HARC for cheek augmentation and correction of midface contour deficiencies compared to a control product HAJV (hereafter referred to as Control). Primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of HARC compared to the Control, by blinded evaluation of change from baseline in midface fullness 12 weeks after last injection, using a 4 grade midface volume scale (MMVS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects over the age of 21 with loss of fullness in the midface area (MMVS score 2, 3, or 4) were randomized 2:1 to treatment with HARC(n=142) or Control (n=68). Optional touch-up was allowed after 4 weeks. Study assessments included MMVS, aesthetic improvement, subject satisfaction, and safety. Subjects were followed for 48 weeks. RESULTS: Overall, most subjects were female (89%) and mean age was 53 years (range 24-80). Total mean volume injected was 4.3 mL for HARC and 4.9 mL for Control. Primary objective was met; mean change from baseline in MMVS score at week 12: -1.4 (HARC), -1.3 (Control), 95% CI: -0.22, 0.06. HARC effectiveness was supported by a high degree of aesthetic improvement and subject satisfaction throughout 48 weeks. Related adverse events were generally mild and transient. CONCLUSIONS:  HARC was well tolerated and non-inferior to Control for correction of midface fullness at 12 weeks after last injection. Aesthetic improvement and subject satisfaction were high and lasted through week 48.  J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(9):949-956. doi:10.36849/JDD.6191.

Open-label Extension Study Evaluating Long-term Safety and Efficacy of FMX103 1.5% Minocycline Topical Foam for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Papulopustular Rosacea.

BACKGROUND: Efficacy and safety of FMX103 1.5% for papulopustular rosacea were previously demonstrated in two 12-week, Phase 3 studies. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of FMX103 1.5% foam for up to 52 weeks of treatment. METHODS: Following the completion of two 12-week, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, Phase 3 studies, subjects were invited to enter a 40-week open-label extension study in which all subjects applied FMX103 1.5% once daily. Efficacy endpoints were the reduction in inflammatory lesions and the rate of IGA treatment success from the double-blind baseline. Safety assessments included adverse events, vital signs, laboratory tests, and facial tolerability signs and symptoms. RESULTS: The favorable safety profile of FMX103 1.5% observed in the double-blind studies was maintained over extended treatment lasting up to one year. There were no serious treatment-related adverse events. Long-term treatment with FMX103 1.5% was associated with a greater than 82-percent reduction in inflammatory lesions from baseline and with over 79 percent of subjects achieving treatment success. At the end of the open-label treatment period, over 82 percent of subjects indicated they were overall "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with FMX103 1.5%. All facial local tolerability symptoms improved through Week 52. LIMITATIONS: Due to the nature of the open-label study, lacking a vehicle-treated control, no statistical comparisons can be made. CONCLUSION: FMX103 1.5% demonstrated a favorable safety and tolerability profile for up to 52 weeks. Long-term efficacy was demonstrated by progressive reductions in inflammatory lesions and increasing IGA treatment success, suggesting that FMX103 1.5% may be a suitable option for the treatment for papulopustular rosacea.

Atopic Dermatitis and the Role of the Skin Microbiome in Choosing Prevention, Treatment, and Maintenance Options.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common skin condition characterized by disturbed barrier function, skin inflammation, and cutaneous dysbiosis. Clinically, it manifests as chronic-recurrent xerosis, pruritus, and erythematous lesions. Its pathophysiology is complex, making the selection of appropriate treatment options a task. AIM: To share insights gained from a literature review and discussions with experts in dermatology on key factors related to the prevention, treatment, and management of AD in relation to the skin microbiome. METHODS: Results from an expert panel were summarized and discussed to provide updated recommendations for the treatment and maintenance of AD. RESULTS: Evidence supports a strategy for managing inflammatory skin diseases with a selenium-rich post-biotic thermal water and biomass containing moisturizer. The moisturizer helps to restore homeostasis of the skin, re-populate a diverse microbiome, encourage the growth of commensal bacteria, and improve barrier function and symptoms of AD. CONCLUSIONS: Normalization of skin microbiome diversity using a topical moisturizer containing post-biotic aqua and biomass may offer a valuable option for the treatment and maintenance of inflammatory skin diseases. Clinicians should discuss the benefits of this treatment in the context of a full AD management program that covers prevention, active treatment, and maintenance. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(10):935-940. doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5393.

Minocycline 1.5% foam for the topical treatment of moderate to severe papulopustular rosacea: Results of 2 phase 3, randomized, clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Efficacious topical medications for rosacea are needed. FMX103 1.5% is a novel topical minocycline foam that may have therapeutic benefits in treating rosacea while minimizing systemic adverse effects due to its topical route of delivery. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 12 weeks of treatment with FMX103 1.5% topical minocycline foam for papulopustular rosacea. METHODS: Two 12-week, phase 3, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, 2-arm studies were performed in patients with moderate to severe papulopustular rosacea. RESULTS: Participants who received FMX103 1.5%, versus control individuals treated with vehicle, exhibited a significantly greater reduction in the number of inflammatory lesions (FX2016-11: -17.57 vs -15.65; P = .0031; FX2016-12: -18.54 vs -14.88; P < .0001) and higher rates of Investigator Global Assessment treatment success (FX2016-11: 52.1% vs 43.0%; P = .0273; FX2016-12: 49.1% vs 39.0%; P = .0077). No serious treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events occurred. LIMITATIONS: The generalizability of these data from a controlled clinical trial should be examined in a real-world setting. CONCLUSIONS: FMX103 1.5% was efficacious for moderate to severe papulopustular rosacea and maintained a favorable safety profile.

Efficacy and safety of a novel topical minocycline foam for the treatment of moderate to severe acne vulgaris: A phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: FMX101 4% topical minocycline foam has been shown to be an effective and safe treatment for acne vulgaris (AV). OBJECTIVE: To further evaluate the efficacy and safety of FMX101 4% in treating moderate to severe acne vulgaris. METHODS: A 12-week, multicenter, randomized (1:1), double-blind, vehicle-controlled study was conducted. Coprimary end points were the absolute change in inflammatory lesion count from baseline and the rate of treatment success (Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 with a ≥2-grade improvement). RESULTS: There were 1488 participants in the intent-to-treat population. The FMX101 4% group had significantly greater reductions in the number of inflammatory lesions from baseline (P < .0001) and a greater rate of treatment success based on Investigator's Global Assessment (P < .0001) versus the foam vehicle group at week 12. FMX101 4% was generally safe and well tolerated. LIMITATIONS: The efficacy and safety of FMX101 4% were not characterized in participants with mild AV. CONCLUSION: FMX101 4% topical minocycline foam was effective and safe for the treatment of moderate to severe AV.

A Cohort Study Using a Facial Cleansing Brush With Acne Cleansing Brush Head and a Gel Cleanser in Subjects With Mild-to-Moderate Acne and Acne-Prone Skin

Introduction: Acne vulgaris is a highly prevalent skin condition that can adversely affect the quality of life. Acne-predisposed skin is in a state of subclinical inflammation leading to skin barrier dysfunction. A multi-center cohort study was designed to evaluate clinical efficacy and safety of twice daily facial cleansing using an oscillatory sonic brush, acne brush head, and cleansing gel for 4 weeks. Methods: Subjects with mild-to-moderate acne and acne-prone skin used the cleansing regime after which they applied the skin care products they routinely used. Physician-assessed skin condition comparing baseline versus week 4 using the FDA/IGA scale and subject satisfaction with cleansing efficacy and handling properties of the regime were scored during the last visit. Results: Forty-six subjects completed the study. Physician-scored skin condition showed a statistically significant improvement in FDA/IGA scores and a significant reduction of inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesions comparing baseline versus 4 weeks. Thirty-five (76.0%) subjects had cleared or almost cleared. Subjects similarly assessed their skin to be improved. Conclusion: Both the physician and subject scores revealed the gentle cleansing routine using the sonic brush to be effective reducing the number of acne lesions, improving skin condition. No adverse events were reported during the study period. The cleansing regime may offer an attractive, safe option for maintenance and treatment of subjects with mild-to-moderate acne and acne-prone skin. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18(11):1140-1145.

Topical natural products in managing dermatologic conditions: observations and recommendations.

Patient requests for nature-based products have increased in dermatologic practices over the last decade. Patients express many reasons for turning to these products, including avoidance of potentially harmful chemicals and the belief that nature-based products are safer than conventional cosmetic products or prescription formulations. Natural products are used in dermatology for both cosmetic and medical purposes. The responsible physician makes prescription and product recommendations based on empirical evidence, labeling, and education, explaining when and how to use the products. Yet much of the evidence, labeling, and education on topical nature-based products is inadequate to fully describe their utility in dermatology and support credible physician recommendations. For these reasons, we recommend: (a) a clear and thorough peer-reviewed compendium of natural ingredients, their intended efficacy, their sources, and rigorous scientific clinical evidence supporting their use; (b) that manufacturers provide standardized transparency into the composition of nature-based formulations through detailed labeling, including amounts and concentrations of ingredients and parts of plants used; and (c) clear preclinical and clinical data using standardized measures and end points demonstrating the efficacy and benefit claims of nature-based formulations.

Facial cleansing with a sonic brush-A review of the literature and current recommendations.

INTRODUCTION: Skin cleansing is important for removal of dirt, debris, and sebum and plays an important role in reduction of pollution-induced skin aging. Cleansing is an established part of treatment recommendations and procedures in dermatology. Different methods for facial skin cleansing are established but recommendations on use of special devices are not fully integrated into clinical practice. AIM: We review the current literature on sonic cleansing to demonstrate that a gentle and effective cleansing routine using a sonic brush followed by appropriate additional methods for rehydration and skin protection may improve both inflammatory conditions including acne vulgaris and skin damage associated with overexposure to exogenous light and pollution. METHODS: A working group of experienced clinicians managing facial inflammatory skin conditions convened for a meeting. The panel reviewed the literature surrounding sonic brush cleansing and discussed clinical questions aiming to optimize facial cleansing outcomes. RESULTS: The panel agreed there are increasing concerns over the rise of atmospheric pollution globally and its impact on health and skin aging and that cleansing in combination with nonspecific skin care is able to support physiological microenvironmental skin conditions including pH levels on the skin surface, barrier function, and hydration. CONCLUSION: Cleansing poses a challenge in balancing debris removal while avoiding excess sebum removal, thereby maintaining an intact stratum corneum barrier. The sonic brush may offer a safe and effective treatment for various conditions.